Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “A Geometry of Music: Harmony and Counterpoint in the Extended Common Practice” as Want to Read:
Rate this book
See a Problem?
A Geometry of Music is accessible to a range of readers, from undergraduate music majors to scientists and mathematicians with an interest in music. Defining its terms along the way, it presupposes no special mathematical background and only a basic familiarity with Western music theory. Feb 02, 2011 A Geometry of Music is accessible to a range of readers, from undergraduate music majors to scientists and mathematicians with an interest in music. Defining its terms along the way, it presupposes no special mathematical background and only a basic familiarity with Western music theory.
We’d love your help. Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of A Geometry of Music by Dmitri Tymoczko.
Not the book you’re looking for?Preview — A Geometry of Music by Dmitri Tymoczko
How is the Beatles' 'Help!' similar to Stravinsky's 'Dance of the Adolescents?' How does Radiohead's 'Just' relate to the improvisations of Bill Evans? And how do Chopin's works exploit the non-Euclidean geometry of musical chords?
In this groundbreaking work, author Dmitri Tymoczko describes a new framework for thinking about music that emphasizes the commonalities among s...more
In this groundbreaking work, author Dmitri Tymoczko describes a new framework for thinking about music that emphasizes the commonalities among s...more
Published March 21st 2011 by Oxford University Press, USA (first published February 2nd 2011)
To see what your friends thought of this book,please sign up.
To ask other readers questions aboutA Geometry of Music,please sign up.
Be the first to ask a question about A Geometry of Music
This book is not yet featured on Listopia.Add this book to your favorite list »
Rating details
|
Tymoczko is an intriguing composer and adept mathematician, so his mix of math and (lots of ) theory can be extremely thought-provoking for readers familiar with both. The mathematical understanding is by no means necessary, however. One can skim the terminology of the early theoretical writing and still comprehend the latter analysis and application. For those who want to dig in, Tymoczko's engaging, conversational tone keeps the reading interesting even through difficult concepts. His theories...more
Aug 18, 2018Eric rated it did not like it
I noticed that at least a couple of reviewers said that they didn't really get the math. I'm almost certain that that's because the math doesn't check out, though it seem impossible to verify since Tymoczko doesn't really phrase his analysis in terms of the linear algebra that he implies. Nor am I sure that anyone else has seriously applied his analytic methodology to a range of musical pieces.
Tymoczko is an excellent composer and all of this must make sense in his head to the degree that he us...more
Tymoczko is an excellent composer and all of this must make sense in his head to the degree that he us...more
Took me nearly a year to get through, but finally did it. A challenge to follow for sure at times, but when it hit, it really hit.
This a milestone in music theory and it constitutes an unification of many western practices in composition based in geometry. Tymoczko shows how orbifolds constitute appropriate musical spaces when each chord is mapped to a point in such space (two voice leading, for example, occurs more efficiently on certain regions of a Möbius band). Efficient voice leading techniques break some different symmetries in these musical spaces. It brings to consciousness procedures that composers of the past hav...more
Mar 05, 2015Michael Curtis rated it really liked it
When considering the geometry of the title think college level math. But while the math was difficult - actually, I understood none of it - it did not matter. The five principles of the book are discussed thoroughly in other ways. Tymoczko's personal history is inspiring and is truly the basis of the book. It reads less like a dissertation and more like a life story. Covers classical, jazz, and rock styles in creating a new conception of tonality.
3 1/2 stars. The geometry disappears as the book turns more to analysis. Which I think speaks to the analytical utility of the geometry. It's good for composers, though, and I enjoyed the intelligent coverage of such a broad range of music.
Libro da corto circuito mentale,
mi ha costretto a rivedere alcuni concetti matematici sepolti o non chiari
e allo stesso tempo, nozioni di composizione e analisi.
L'ho cominciato con un timore riverenziale pensando che coprisse solo la musica classica
ma mi ha sorpreso e non poco.
mi ha costretto a rivedere alcuni concetti matematici sepolti o non chiari
e allo stesso tempo, nozioni di composizione e analisi.
L'ho cominciato con un timore riverenziale pensando che coprisse solo la musica classica
ma mi ha sorpreso e non poco.
Ashley Joseph Whitney rated it it was ok
Jul 21, 2018
Jul 21, 2018
Michael Brooks rated it really liked it
Mar 30, 2013
Mar 30, 2013
David R. Norman rated it it was amazing
Sep 02, 2017
Sep 02, 2017
Victor Tittle rated it really liked it
Jan 26, 2013
Jan 26, 2013
Jason Quackenbush rated it it was amazing
Mar 27, 2015
Mar 27, 2015
Vedad FamourZadeh rated it it was amazing
Jul 06, 2012
Jul 06, 2012
Sean Mckinney rated it did not like it
Jan 03, 2018
Jan 03, 2018
John.Kiehlsoundtrackny.Com rated it it was amazing
Feb 09, 2016
Feb 09, 2016
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.Be the first to start one »
Recommend It | Stats | Recent Status Updates
See similar books…
If you like books and love to build cool products, we may be looking for you.
Learn more »
Learn more »
See top shelves…
2followers
“I will argue that five features are present in a wide range of genres, Western and non-Western, past and present, and that they jointly contribute to a sense of tonality: 1. Conjunct melodic motion. Melodies tend to move by short distances from note to note. 2. Acoustic consonance. Consonant harmonies are preferred to dissonant harmonies, and tend to be used at points of musical stability. 3. Harmonic consistency. The harmonies in a passage of music, whatever they may be, tend to be structurally similar to one another. 4. Limited macroharmony. I use the term “macroharmony” to refer to the total collection of notes heard over moderate spans of musical time. Tonal music tends to use relatively small” — 1 likes
“Of these five features, harmonic consistency is clearly the most culturally specific. The idea that music should consist of rapidly changing chords is a deeply Western idea, in a double sense: it is deep, insofar as it characterizes much Western music since before the Renaissance; and it is Western, since there are many cultures in which the notion of a “chord progression” simply plays no role. (Many traditional non-Western styles are purely monophonic, or feature an unchanging “drone” harmony;” — 0 likes
More quotes…A spectrogram of a violin waveform, with linear frequency on the vertical axis and time on the horizontal axis. The bright lines show how the spectral components change over time. The intensity colouring is logarithmic (black is −120 dBFS).
Music theory has no axiomatic foundation in modern mathematics, yet the basis of musical sound can be described mathematically (in acoustics) and exhibits 'a remarkable array of number properties'.[1]Elements of music such as its form, rhythm and metre, the pitches of its notes and the tempo of its pulse can be related to the measurement of time and frequency, offering ready analogies in geometry.
The attempt to structure and communicate new ways of composing and hearing music has led to musical applications of set theory, abstract algebra and number theory. Some composers have incorporated the golden ratio and Fibonacci numbers into their work.[2][3]
- 5Tuning systems
- 6Connections to mathematics
History[edit]
Though ancient Chinese, Indians, Egyptians and Mesopotamians are known to have studied the mathematical principles of sound,[4] the Pythagoreans (in particular Philolaus and Archytas)[5] of ancient Greece were the first researchers known to have investigated the expression of musical scales in terms of numerical ratios,[6] particularly the ratios of small integers. Their central doctrine was that 'all nature consists of harmony arising out of numbers'.[7]
From the time of Plato, harmony was considered a fundamental branch of physics, now known as musical acoustics. Early Indian and Chinese theorists show similar approaches: all sought to show that the mathematical laws of harmonics and rhythms were fundamental not only to our understanding of the world but to human well-being.[8]Confucius, like Pythagoras, regarded the small numbers 1,2,3,4 as the source of all perfection.[9]
Time, rhythm and meter[edit]
Without the boundaries of rhythmic structure – a fundamental equal and regular arrangement of pulserepetition, accent, phrase and duration – music would not be possible.[10] Modern musical use of terms like meter and measure also reflects the historical importance of music, along with astronomy, in the development of counting, arithmetic and the exact measurement of time and periodicity that is fundamental to physics.[citation needed]
The elements of musical form often build strict proportions or hypermetric structures (powers of the numbers 2 and 3).[11]
Musical form[edit]
Musical form is the plan by which a short piece of music is extended. The term 'plan' is also used in architecture, to which musical form is often compared. Like the architect, the composer must take into account the function for which the work is intended and the means available, practicing economy and making use of repetition and order.[12] The common types of form known as binary and ternary ('twofold' and 'threefold') once again demonstrate the importance of small integral values to the intelligibility and appeal of music.[citation needed]
Frequency and harmony[edit]
Chladni figures produced by sound vibrations in fine powder on a square plate. (Ernst Chladni, Acoustics, 1802)
A musical scale is a discrete set of pitches used in making or describing music. The most important scale in the Western tradition is the diatonic scale but many others have been used and proposed in various historical eras and parts of the world. Each pitch corresponds to a particular frequency, expressed in hertz (Hz), sometimes referred to as cycles per second (c.p.s.). A scale has an interval of repetition, normally the octave. The octave of any pitch refers to a frequency exactly twice that of the given pitch.
Succeeding superoctaves are pitches found at frequencies four, eight, sixteen times, and so on, of the fundamental frequency. Pitches at frequencies of half, a quarter, an eighth and so on of the fundamental are called suboctaves. There is no case in musical harmony where, if a given pitch be considered accordant, that its octaves are considered otherwise. Therefore, any note and its octaves will generally be found similarly named in musical systems (e.g. all will be called doh or A or Sa, as the case may be).
When expressed as a frequency bandwidth an octave A2–A3 spans from 110 Hz to 220 Hz (span=110 Hz). The next octave will span from 220 Hz to 440 Hz (span=220 Hz). The third octave spans from 440 Hz to 880 Hz (span=440 Hz) and so on. Each successive octave spans twice the frequency range of the previous octave.
The exponential nature of octaves when measured on a linear frequency scale.
This diagram presents octaves as they appear in the sense of musical intervals, equally spaced.
Because we are often interested in the relations or ratios between the pitches (known as intervals) rather than the precise pitches themselves in describing a scale, it is usual to refer to all the scale pitches in terms of their ratio from a particular pitch, which is given the value of one (often written 1/1), generally a note which functions as the tonic of the scale. For interval size comparison, cents are often used.
Common name | Example name Hz | Multiple of fundamental | Ratio within octave | Cents within octave |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fundamental | A2, 110 | 1/1 = 1x | 0 | |
Octave | A3220 | 2x | 2/1 = 2x | 1200 |
2/2 = 1x | 0 | |||
Perfect Fifth | E4330 | 3/2 = 1.5x | 702 | |
Octave | A4440 | 4x | 4/2 = 2x | 1200 |
4/4 = 1x | 0 | |||
Major Third | C♯5550 | 5/4 = 1.25x | 386 | |
Perfect Fifth | E5660 | 6x | 6/4 = 1.5x | 702 |
Harmonic seventh | G5770 | 7/4 = 1.75x | 969 | |
Octave | A5880 | 8x | 8/4 = 2x | 1200 |
8/8 = 1x | 0 |
|-
Tuning systems[edit]
There are two main families of tuning systems: equal temperament and just tuning. Equal temperament scales are built by dividing an octave into intervals which are equal on a logarithmic scale, which results in perfectly evenly divided scales, but with ratios of frequencies which are irrational numbers. Just scales are built by multiplying frequencies by rational numbers, which results in simple ratios between frequencies, but with scale divisions that are uneven.
One major difference between equal temperament tunings and just tunings is differences in acoustical beat when two notes are sounded together, which affects the subjective experience of consonance and dissonance. Both of these systems, and the vast majority of music in general, have scales that repeat on the interval of every octave, which is defined as frequency ratio of 2:1. In other words, every time the frequency is doubled, the given scale repeats.
Below are Ogg Vorbis files demonstrating the difference between just intonation and equal temperament. You might need to play the samples several times before you can detect the difference.
- Two sine waves played consecutively – this sample has half-step at 550 Hz (C♯ in the just intonation scale), followed by a half-step at 554.37 Hz (C♯ in the equal temperament scale).
- Same two notes, set against an A440 pedal – this sample consists of a 'dyad'. The lower note is a constant A (440 Hz in either scale), the upper note is a C♯ in the equal-tempered scale for the first 1', and a C♯ in the just intonation scale for the last 1'. Phase differences make it easier to detect the transition than in the previous sample.
Just tunings[edit]
5-limit tuning, the most common form of just intonation, is a system of tuning using tones that are regular numberharmonics of a single fundamental frequency. This was one of the scales Johannes Kepler presented in his Harmonices Mundi (1619) in connection with planetary motion. The same scale was given in transposed form by Scottish mathematician and musical theorist, Alexander Malcolm, in 1721 in his 'Treatise of Musick: Speculative, Practical and Historical',[13] and by theorist Jose Wuerschmidt in the 20th century. A form of it is used in the music of northern India.
American composer Terry Riley also made use of the inverted form of it in his 'Harp of New Albion'. Just intonation gives superior results when there is little or no chord progression: voices and other instruments gravitate to just intonation whenever possible. However, it gives two different whole tone intervals (9:8 and 10:9) because a fixed tuned instrument, such as a piano, cannot change key.[14] To calculate the frequency of a note in a scale given in terms of ratios, the frequency ratio is multiplied by the tonic frequency. For instance, with a tonic of A4 (A natural above middle C), the frequency is 440 Hz, and a justly tuned fifth above it (E5) is simply 440×(3:2) = 660 Hz.
The first 16 harmonics, their names and frequencies, showing the exponential nature of the octave and the simple fractional nature of non-octave harmonics.
The first 16 harmonics, with frequencies and log frequencies.
Semitone | Ratio | Interval | Natural | Half Step |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1:1 | unison | 480 | 0 |
1 | 16:15 | minor semitone | 512 | 16:15 |
2 | 9:8 | major second | 540 | 135:128 |
3 | 6:5 | minor third | 576 | 16:15 |
4 | 5:4 | major third | 600 | 25:24 |
5 | 4:3 | perfect fourth | 640 | 16:15 |
6 | 45:32 | diatonic tritone | 675 | 135:128 |
7 | 3:2 | perfect fifth | 720 | 16:15 |
8 | 8:5 | minor sixth | 768 | 16:15 |
9 | 5:3 | major sixth | 800 | 25:24 |
10 | 9:5 | minor seventh | 864 | 27:25 |
11 | 15:8 | major seventh | 900 | 25:24 |
12 | 2:1 | octave | 960 | 16:15 |
Pythagorean tuning is tuning based only on the perfect consonances, the (perfect) octave, perfect fifth, and perfect fourth. Thus the major third is considered not a third but a ditone, literally 'two tones', and is (9:8)2 = 81:64, rather than the independent and harmonic just 5:4 = 80:64 directly below. A whole tone is a secondary interval, being derived from two perfect fifths, (3:2)2 = 9:8.
The just major third, 5:4 and minor third, 6:5, are a syntonic comma, 81:80, apart from their Pythagorean equivalents 81:64 and 32:27 respectively. According to CarlDahlhaus (1990, p. 187), 'the dependent third conforms to the Pythagorean, the independent third to the harmonic tuning of intervals.'
Western common practice music usually cannot be played in just intonation but requires a systematically tempered scale. The tempering can involve either the irregularities of well temperament or be constructed as a regular temperament, either some form of equal temperament or some other regular meantone, but in all cases will involve the fundamental features of meantone temperament. For example, the root of chord ii, if tuned to a fifth above the dominant, would be a major whole tone (9:8) above the tonic. If tuned a just minor third (6:5) below a just subdominant degree of 4:3, however, the interval from the tonic would equal a minor whole tone (10:9). Meantone temperament reduces the difference between 9:8 and 10:9. Their ratio, (9:8)/(10:9) = 81:80, is treated as a unison. The interval 81:80, called the syntonic comma or comma of Didymus, is the key comma of meantone temperament.
Equal temperament tunings[edit]
In equal temperament, the octave is divided into equal parts on the logarithmic scale. While it is possible to construct equal temperament scale with any number of notes (for example, the 24-tone Arab tone system), the most common number is 12, which makes up the equal-temperament chromatic scale. In western music, a division into twelve intervals is commonly assumed unless it is specified otherwise.
For the chromatic scale, the octave is divided into twelve equal parts, each semitone (half-step) is an interval of the twelfth root of two so that twelve of these equal half steps add up to exactly an octave. With fretted instruments it is very useful to use equal temperament so that the frets align evenly across the strings. In the European music tradition, equal temperament was used for lute and guitar music far earlier than for other instruments, such as musical keyboards. Because of this historical force, twelve-tone equal temperament is now the dominant intonation system in the Western, and much of the non-Western, world.
Equally tempered scales have been used and instruments built using various other numbers of equal intervals. The 19 equal temperament, first proposed and used by Guillaume Costeley in the 16th century, uses 19 equally spaced tones, offering better major thirds and far better minor thirds than normal 12-semitone equal temperament at the cost of a flatter fifth. The overall effect is one of greater consonance. Twenty-four equal temperament, with twenty-four equally spaced tones, is widespread in the pedagogy and notation of Arabic music. However, in theory and practice, the intonation of Arabic music conforms to rational ratios, as opposed to the irrational ratios of equally tempered systems.[15]
While any analog to the equally tempered quarter tone is entirely absent from Arabic intonation systems, analogs to a three-quarter tone, or neutral second, frequently occur. These neutral seconds, however, vary slightly in their ratios dependent on maqam, as well as geography. Indeed, Arabic music historian Habib Hassan Touma has written that 'the breadth of deviation of this musical step is a crucial ingredient in the peculiar flavor of Arabian music. To temper the scale by dividing the octave into twenty-four quarter-tones of equal size would be to surrender one of the most characteristic elements of this musical culture.'[15]
Connections to mathematics[edit]
Set theory[edit]
Musical set theory uses the language of mathematical set theory in an elementary way to organize musical objects and describe their relationships. To analyze the structure of a piece of (typically atonal) music using musical set theory, one usually starts with a set of tones, which could form motives or chords. By applying simple operations such as transposition and inversion, one can discover deep structures in the music. Operations such as transposition and inversion are called isometries because they preserve the intervals between tones in a set.
Abstract algebra[edit]
Expanding on the methods of musical set theory, some theorists have used abstract algebra to analyze music. For example, the pitch classes in an equally tempered octave form an abelian group with 12 elements. It is possible to describe just intonation in terms of a free abelian group.[16][17]
Transformational theory is a branch of music theory developed by David Lewin. The theory allows for great generality because it emphasizes transformations between musical objects, rather than the musical objects themselves.
Theorists have also proposed musical applications of more sophisticated algebraic concepts. The theory of regular temperaments has been extensively developed with a wide range of sophisticated mathematics, for example by associating each regular temperament with a rational point on a Grassmannian.
The chromatic scale has a free and transitive action of the cyclic group, with the action being defined via transposition of notes. So the chromatic scale can be thought of as a torsor for the group
.[1]
See also[edit]
- 3rd bridge (harmonic resonance based on equal string divisions)
- Euclidean rhythms (traditional musical rhythms that are generated by Euclid's algorithm)
References[edit]
- ^Reginald Smith Brindle, The New Music, Oxford University Press, 1987, pp 42-3
- ^Reginald Smith Brindle, The New Music, Oxford University Press, 1987, Chapter 6 passim
- ^'Eric - Math and Music: Harmonious Connections'.
- ^Reginald Smith Brindle, The New Music, Oxford University Press, 1987, p 42
- ^Purwins, Hendrik (2005). Profiles of Pitch Classes Circularity of Relative Pitch and Key-Experiments, Models, Computational Music Analysis, and Perspectives(PDF). pp. 22–24.
- ^Plato (trans. Desmond Lee) The Republic, Harmondsworth Penguin 1974, page 340, note.
- ^Sir James Jeans, Science and Music, Dover 1968, p. 154.
- ^Alain Danielou, Introduction to the Study of Musical Scales, Mushiram Manoharlal 1999, Chapter 1 passim.
- ^Sir James Jeans, Science and Music, Dover 1968, p. 155.
- ^Arnold Whittall, in The Oxford Companion to Music, OUP, 2002, Article: Rhythm
- ^'Александр Виноград, Многообразие проявлений музыкального метра (LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2013)'.
- ^Imogen Holst, The ABC of Music, Oxford 1963, p.100
- ^Malcolm, Alexander; Mitchell, Mr (Joseph) (25 May 2018). 'A treatise of musick, speculative, practical and historical'. Edinburgh : Printed for the author – via Internet Archive.
- ^Jeremy Montagu, in The Oxford Companion to Music, OUP 2002, Article: just intonation.
- ^ abTouma, Habib Hassan (1996). The Music of the Arabs. Portland, OR: Amadeus Press. pp. 22–24. ISBN0-931340-88-8.
- ^'Algebra of Tonal Functions'.
- ^'Harmonic Limit'.
- Dahlhaus, Carl. 1990. Wagners Konzeption des musikalischen Dramas. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag. Kassel: Bärenreiter. ISBN9783423045384; ISBN9783761845387.
External links[edit]
- Music: A Mathematical Offering by Dave Benson.
- Nicolaus Mercator use of Ratio Theory in Music at Convergence
- The Glass Bead Game Hermann Hesse gave music and mathematics a crucial role in the development of his Glass Bead Game.
- Harmony and Proportion. Pythagoras, Music and Space.
- Notefreqs — A complete table of note frequencies and ratios for midi, piano, guitar, bass, and violin. Includes fret measurements (in cm and inches) for building instruments.
- Mathematics & Music, BBC Radio 4 discussion with Marcus du Sautoy, Robin Wilson & Ruth Tatlow (In Our Time, May 25, 2006)
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Music_and_mathematics&oldid=900180229'